Battlefield 2042: PC Performance Video Review

38 Comments

1. all i'm wondering is who would test performance with V-sync locked at 60fps 0.o

2. If anyone is wondering right now it runs like shit on any PC less than the the best and still doesnt run great on the best. No one is worried about 4k barely 30fps. They want 60fps at low and its not happening right now.

3. Should I set to 60FPS or try running at 145FPS to match monitor? Have a Ryzen 3950X OCD to 4.3 on all 12 cores and runs amazing at a max high of 63C under load! GPU is 2080 Super yet trying to buy a 3080 or 3090 FTW3 which has been impossible sadly 😔

4. Yeah won‘t buy that.

5. Game needs to be optimized to utilize more cores.

6. RTX 3070
   I7- 10700k
   16GB RAM

   It doesnt make a diffrence if ultra, or everything set to low 30-40 FPS

7. Ps5 is running it so smoothly it's been great 👍

8. I'll stick to bf4 for now until this comes to game pass. By then there should have been some updates 😉. I don't think it's worth buying now.

9. Who actually turn on Ray Tracing in this game?? Ray Tracing= Seeing enemy's muzzle flash 60 frames later lmfao

10. I bought a gaming laptop 1080p, intel i7 11th gen, rtx 3060, 16gb ram. Tbh I can run eberything in the highest settings with no problems and steady fps. I might be wrong but it might be because of the 1080p screen. But yeah I dont need 4k since its small screen.

11. Crappy performance on pc whatever the seetings. I solved it by asking for a refund.

12. Seems like covid era killed these devs. Remember BF1 back in 2016 , beautiful visuals and great performance.

13. Any game that practically requires a 3090 to play is fucking ridiculous

14. I'm getting 95fps and average 110 1440p with a 3080/5950x combo. Ultra everthing(except ray tracing)

15. Performance is absolute garbage , this game needs 12 more months in the oven , buy it on sale don’t waste your money

16. Yeah, let's ignore the most popular GPUs.
    Because everybody has RTX 3090s….

17. If you only rate performance against 60 fps then sure most games are fine. But PC gamers who pay $3000 on PC arent shootomg for that and Frostibites CPU hogging BS is getting tiresome at this point. If the tech wasnt ready for 128 player servers then why push it?

    So the 1% of PC gamers can enjoy it at 100+ fps and everyone else plays a stuttery mess.

    I was getting 130 fps on my 3070/ 3900x but it FELT like 40fps with all the stuttering .

    Deathloop
    Cp77
    Now 2042

    To all devs who want to "push the envelope graphically" Make games accessible again, or delay it until its ready, this is getting ridiculous. COD gets stick for not upgrading their engine but its cos they know the game needs to play fast and smooth and I applaud them for that at least.

18. PC master race gets the short end of the stick with optimization… Yet again.

19. This game was not ready

20. The minimum CPU requirements are for a Ryzen 1600 not the 3600X that you're using.

21. I do not understand why we are sitting here talking about 4k….almost no one plays games on a 4k monitor it just doesn't make sense. Half this review was spent talking about Ray tracing which no one will use. It also looks a lot better than the previous titles. Strange review.

22. Could an acer nitro 5 play this?

23. can it run battlefield lmao

24. I wonder why their is no frostbite engine 4 for this game?

25. 0:22 That's Battlefield 1, not Battlefield 4.

26. This is the thrift store version of digital foundry.

27. IGN talking about PC performance what a joke

28. Can't wait for IGN to give this a 4 and cod a 9 for innovation and destruction 🤣

29. The most annoying thing is the bullet registration. It just doesn't work well.
    Im shooting an enemy point blank from close range and the bullets are not dealing any damage…………………………….

    Moreover, vehicle and pilot controls and feelings are not fluid at all for PC gamers. It is made for controller players as I see all of the PC players are struggling with the controls.

30. Who the fuck considers a fast paced, 128 player FPS game at 70fps "well performing"

31. XBOX RUNNING BETTER THAN PC LOLLLL

32. 3090 at 60 fps… you're kidding.. this game is already dead at launch.

33. The real problem with this game and Call Of Duty is that the gameplay sucks

34. Good to see NXGamer getting some visibility.

35. This is the most generic lets target 60fps trash video, I will just wait for Hardware unboxed for a proper performance guide.

36. halo it is

37. My desktop is 6 years old… been waiting for the 3090s to come down in price to go all out on an AMD build, the 64 core threadripper one and 256GB of RAM. You can't have enough RAM or CPU when your side hobby is 3d computer graphics photorealistic rendering. For now I'm just going to use my Sager NP9176 laptop from 2019. RTX 2080 gpu (performs like a 2070 on a desktop), 64GB of RAM and the i9 9900k desktop CPU. If I can play 1440p ultra some items on high at 60fps, which I can with pretty much any other game, that's fine for me.

38. Who plays battlefield at 4k ultra? Nobody except ign 😆 1440p high settings is the highest PC gamers will go

Comments are closed.