I WAS ABLE TO USE YOUR PHILOSOPHICAL FRAMEWORK IN MY THESIS PROPOSAL.
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY YOUR VIRTUAL REALITY ARE THEY RELATED TO THE STUDY OF POTRAYAL OF FALSE REALITY …ARE THEY CONNECTED IN YOUR STUDY ASK LANG PO
Similar to a frank Herbert novel the heaven makers
Shared on Facebook January 26, 2022
wrong right off the bat. They are realities generated by HUMANS with computers. Not generated by computers.
Hello Mr Chalmers, what about consciousness BEING the running of a virtual reality, on a hardware that is, actually, the brain ? (this virtual reality being the modern expression of Kant's "phenomenal world"). What is fascinating to contemplate, is the idea that this virtual world's ontology could be slightly different from the real world ontology, and would include the existence of virtual entities like persons, qualia and will, and properties like consciousness, which would only exist in this virtual world, while in the "real" world ("noumenal" would say Kant) the only things that exist would be particles and forces ? Wouldn't it validate reductive materialism ? (under the "cognitive bias" form).
I WAS ABLE TO USE YOUR PHILOSOPHICAL FRAMEWORK IN MY THESIS PROPOSAL.
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY YOUR VIRTUAL REALITY ARE THEY RELATED TO THE STUDY OF POTRAYAL OF FALSE REALITY …ARE THEY CONNECTED IN YOUR STUDY ASK LANG PO
Similar to a frank Herbert novel the heaven makers
Shared on Facebook January 26, 2022
wrong right off the bat. They are realities generated by HUMANS with computers. Not generated by computers.
Hello Mr Chalmers, what about consciousness BEING the running of a virtual reality, on a hardware that is, actually, the brain ? (this virtual reality being the modern expression of Kant's "phenomenal world"). What is fascinating to contemplate, is the idea that this virtual world's ontology could be slightly different from the real world ontology, and would include the existence of virtual entities like persons, qualia and will, and properties like consciousness, which would only exist in this virtual world, while in the "real" world ("noumenal" would say Kant) the only things that exist would be particles and forces ? Wouldn't it validate reductive materialism ? (under the "cognitive bias" form).
Yes