Recommended For You

About the Author: Tendo

34 Comments

  1. They give the Triple A titles high scores so they keep getting future review copies. If they gave a CoD game a low score and shit on it, they wouldn't get anymore review copies from them.

  2. Even I know Alien Isolation is GOATED and I’ve never played it because I’m a scared little bitch when it comes to horror. When a review is so bad that even Charlie’s reaction is “Nani da fuck?” that’s when you know you’ve done something horribly wrong.

  3. The one that he said the game is not persona was so stupid, I don’t even know the game he reviewed but I got super mad every time he said “it’s not like persona”

  4. Too much water was absolutely valid argument. Because in order to play the game you need to have only electric Pokémon, and you are not allowed to explore with different type. It deserved lower score.

  5. Too much water was a fair criticism, people were just too lazy to watch the review and understand she meant water type and tedious traveling

  6. Bo3 is u justified. Great game the review just had bad timing with other singleplayer games that people loved getting lower scores. But a 9 bo3 especially at launch before pay to win dlc weapons is completely fair. The campaign was ass but alot of people dgaf about cod campaign and it you could play it co-op which made it actually fun for me or else id have never touched campaign alone. It has some of the best mp and zombies of cod to date. Great balance of movement and advanced tech without going too far to feel like a diff game. Big skill gap. It was honestly the last good cod we've gotten

  7. Days Gone and Death Stranding didn’t deserve a score over 2.5. Those reviews were absolutely paid for, especially if these reviews were shortly after their launches.

  8. This video is so low effort that I couldn't take it seriously. Clearly this video exists to pander to people who hate IGN and farm views. I mean yeah some of the reviews here are brain dead like that Alien Isolation but quite a few of them are surprisingly fair like Uncharted 4. Regardless of which spectrum a review falls under there isn't an opinion here beyond 'IGN sucks' and to maintain that point the guy would overlook the things inherently wrong with the games themselves and use excuses coming from fanboys to justify his point that IGN sucks.

  9. I’m surprised he didn’t include Evolve, the game that was so hyped up in E3 that when it came out it only had one map and one mode of just jogging around a map. Angryjoe does a good job of explaining why the game sucked

  10. the narrator had to be trolling, some of the shit he said doesn’t make sense, like how he compares one game getting a lower score than COD even though they are reviewed by different fucking people. He is talking to a company like it’s a living reviewer that just hates all games and loves COD.
    Some of these are actually garbage, but days gone review is absolutely fine and I feel bad for the reviewer that decided to give a fair, medium review just to get bombarded with hate. That’s how you get every game at 7+/10.

Comments are closed.