The MOST powerful smartphone chip 3.0! A16 vs 8+ Gen1 vs Tensor 2 vs Exynos vs Dimensity vs Kirin!

The MOST powerful smartphone chip 3.0! A16 vs 8+ Gen1 vs Tensor 2 vs Exynos vs Dimensity vs Kirin!




Head to https://squarespace.com/versus to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code versus! Round 3 of …

source

Recommended For You

About the Author: Versus

46 Comments

  1. They didn't run multiple trials on the exynos clearly because I'm running a s21 fe and it score close to the tensor 2 even, and that's with the exynos 2100

  2. You should make a performance test opening apps and games and seeing how long it takes the devices to do so and if they keep them open in the background

  3. SD Gen1+ nearly beaten A16.
    It already beaten A15. This shows competition is catching up in Chipset to Apple.
    Just like competition caught up with Pixel camera after Google got lazy with camera post Pixel 2 by using the same 5 years old lens even now. Etc 6a

  4. Samsung's are hand grenades , snapdragons are good for budget phones and also for flagships , i phone chips are good but i don't think they wroth 1.3 lakh INR ,Why the hell using glass in back that repair costs 45k INR 🗑️

  5. So impressive to see that A16 is gernerations ahead from android phones! Even A15 or 14 could do better than most there 😀! Really well put together

  6. Thank you for this amazing comparison and we really appreciate your efforts.

    I would love to see a comparison between generations of the best snapdragon processors within the last 5 years.

    Same with apple bionic processors, I know you can do it 🔥🔥

  7. Next time, I think you should use mAh instead of battery percentage. It would be more accurate and informative since each phone has different battery capacity.

  8. Weird to see Kirin performing so badly (compared to what I've seen, not the current competition), I always thought it had 675k results in Antutu, and Geek bench being around 1000/3600 rather than 883/2879
    Either way great video as usual

    Edit: yes I know it's old but it did compete with the A14 and in most regards was better than the 888 and even the 8 Gen 1 in actual gaming performance instead of raw benchmarks

  9. @7:33 hi all, just a small doubt can some one explain why there is significant variation in memory score in non iPhone models, cause all devices except iPhone use UFS 3.1 storage and hope all use DDR4X RAM still

Comments are closed.