Total War: Rome Remastered reviewed by Leana Hafer on PC. #IGN #TotalWarRomeRemastered.
source
Total War: Rome Remastered Review
Recommended For You
36 Comments
Comments are closed.
Total War: Rome Remastered reviewed by Leana Hafer on PC. #IGN #TotalWarRomeRemastered.
source
Comments are closed.
Though it wasn't made available for this review, Total War: Rome Remastered offers a free, Enhanced Graphics Pack that includes greatly enhanced textures – and it does go a long way toward bringing the look of the units up to a level of quality more like what you'd expect in a modern Total War game. Weapons and armor, especially, look much shinier and more realistic. Faces don't look nearly as flat and dead, though the overall quality level is still below Rome 2 or Shogun 2. It also adds about 20 GB to the install and impacted my performance on the Extreme unit size to the point that I was no longer able to cruise at 60+fps on my GeForce RTX 2060 Super with no major dips, like I was without the pack installed. – Leana H.
Real fight means that the army and troops could be lead with the camera down near to the ground otherwise it's not reality and is easy to win
.
Yeah this guy can go back in time all he wants he would still get beat up by his middle school bully……
when will we have medival 2 remastered ?
if you can still edit data files and stuff, you can edit all factions to have more moral etc. You can edit most everything in rome
nice 🙂
That looks like 2004 rome total war. What's the point of that in 2021?
Wait a second. Did he complain about Rome Total War music? Are you kidding me!
If you can move your camera freely around and can use WASD then it's a win for me
Are these fuckers serious
Eeww that's not remastered, more like a rebastard 😂
The original Rome was the best, especially in game battles…
rome total war is the best total war game imo
“This remastered game is just like the original game” IGN 7/10
This is a terrible review. Sincerely dissapointed with IGN rn 🙁
are there naval battles?
Not surprised when a game journalist plays like a game journalist
a time long past 2004 got me laughing
Useless reviewer. Get a new job.
Glad to see IGN has continued its tradition of intellectually questionable "reviewers" (lol) who don't even know what remaster means.
It’s still my fave TW, and the reskin looks pretty dope. It’s worth the $15 IMO
Ridiculous review, no wonder people ignore you critics
Imagine complaining about a game from 2004 and expecting a complete remake of the games mechanics. It’s just a reskin, and that is okay.
It is called remaster not remake lol
They might as well do a remaster of rome 2 since it's been that long since it was released
They just made it look like a mobile game, this is really embarrassing lmao
IGN, stop comparing a 2004 game to nowadays, does the company who made the game a bad rep, gives the game a bad rep and give YOU a bad rep.
its a remaster not a remake what do you expect
who on earth would rather play Attila?
Now if EA would remaster Battle for middle earth 1 that would be awesome
Don't agree with uou at all!
Nah
Sound to me that you are dissapointed you didn't get a new game
did they change all the rebel settlements? its boring taking those settlements they need to put factions in all of them
Legit one of the worst reviews I’ve heard ANYWHERE!
7/10 They didn't make a new game, this one kinda old, yikers – IGN
Also, at 3:58 you can clearly read that it says "right click for more information" really difficult indeed