Recommended For You

About the Author: TechRadar

41 Comments

  1. exynos is better and optimized to samsung and its battery life is not bad …..while snapdragon is optimized to other android
    phones …. samsung with snapdragon seems a weird combination

  2. Why does every YouTuber have to talk like this where they speak normally throughout most of the sentence but then … at… the.. end.. put..pauses…between…the…final……..words…..?

  3. I m using s9 plus EU or exynos model. Battery save mode on, dark theme, dark screensaver, hi resolution off, bixby off, brightness 30% and all other good stuff shut off. So im using a phone at lowest capacity possible. I get max 3 1/2 hours screen time. This chip is bullshit, even we pay more the price in te UK and EU, we always get trash. On my old iphone i m getting 7 hours of screen time and i never use a battery save mode.

  4. I'd take these results with a grain of salt considering they've only got a sample size of 1 for each processor variant. If we could get more phones tested and run at least 3 tests with each phone, I'd be more comfortable taking these tests to be truth.

  5. Samsung did a shit job with Exynos this year. Bad optimization in general. And Samsung really needs to get a new GPU for the Exynos. The Mali GPUs suck compared to the Adreno.

  6. Samsung still should use only Exynos… Qualcomm needs a good competition and with only one processor, Samsung could optimize the Software better, just like they did on the S6…

Comments are closed.