Recommended For You

About the Author: IGN

20 Comments

  1. nah …. with this kind of graphic … The Witcher 3 do it better . RPG games with continues story with full price for the 1st one arc is not worthly.

  2. 33-40 hrs for part 1 isn't too bad, if it ends short of disc 1 on the original. there probably around 5 parts to FF7 remake

  3. For a Final Fantasy game, completing it in 30-40 hours is actually pretty short. Personally, I have put over 100 hours in some Final Fantasy games before I even beat them. So at 30-40 hours, this might be a full-length game, but it is NOT a full-length Final Fantasy game, in my opinion. Obviously ignoring the fact that this is only part 1 of the entire Final Fantasy 7 story. But not everyone invests as much time in a FF game as I do before beating it, so many people will feel completely different than I do. Regardless, they fleshed-out a part of the original that was only around 6 hours, lengthening it to 30+ hours. The only real question now is how much of the new stuff feels like filler, and how much feels like a genuine part of the story?

  4. If this game isn’t every bit of the original story I’m going to freak out. These reviews all tout a complete game, but I don’t see any footage outside of Midgar.

  5. If I can't get 100+ hours out of this game to get 100% completion, then it's too short.

    I'm talking every item, every quest, max level and stats, etc.

  6. A trilogy and what would be fantastic is over 100 DLC's please, and natural updates to keep the graphics improved to keep it getting better and better. Get ff7 online made as well. Make it an FF7 that's un-outdatable lol! This is your holy grail, maintain it!

    Get more FF remakes done!!!

Comments are closed.